Stephen Ross Scorecard | Our Piedmont Education Foundation

← Back to all candidate scorecards

Stephen M. Ross

Republican · North Carolina House · District 63

Alamance County (Burlington area)

Our Piedmont Score

+9 / 9

100% · Fully aligned

CoolHot

Responsiveness Score to Piedmont Concerns

Demographic & Background

Residence: Burlington, Alamance County, NC

Occupation: Business / real estate

Prior Public Service: NC House (previous terms + current)

Other: Contiguous to Guilford; consistent Republican voting record on tracked bills.

Voting Record on Key Issues (2025–2026 Session)

Affordability / housing / tax items (first three rows) are weighted double. See footnotes.

Bill / Issue	Vote	Weight	Notes
SB 889 – Property Tax Reappraisal Moratorium	Voted For	+2	Supported temporary freeze of 2026 revaluation values
HB 162 – Parking Lot Reform / Stormwater Control Act	Voted For	+2	Near-unanimous bipartisan support
SB 445 – Regulatory Reform Act of 2026 (ADU + commercial redevelopment)	Supported	+2	Supported the package containing ADU and commercial-redevelopment provisions (see footnote on status)
HB 87 – Educational Choice for Children Act	Voted For	+1	Supported school-choice tax-credit expansion (veto override)
SB 153 – North Carolina Border Protection Act (287(g))	Voted For	+1	Supported mandatory 287(g) and related measures (veto override)
DEI Prohibition bills (HB 171 / SB 227 / SB 558)	Voted For	+1	Supported bans on DEI promotion in state agencies, K-12, and higher education

Footnotes

1. Weighting: The three affordability / housing / tax items (SB 889, HB 162, SB 445) are weighted twice as heavily as the other issues to reflect the project’s priority on property-tax affordability and housing supply in the Piedmont.

2. SB 445 status: As of this writing (July 2026) SB 445 remains in conference committee after the House passed an amended version and the Senate declined to concur. Scoring reflects the legislator’s clear position relative to the regulatory-reform package that contained the ADU and commercial-redevelopment provisions.

3. Key absences: An excused absence or non-vote on a double-weighted (affordability) bill carries a light penalty of –1 instead of zero.

4. Party gravity: No votes by this legislator broke party gravity on the tracked bills.

Sources: NC General Assembly roll-call records, bill trackers, official biography. Official photo: NC General Assembly. Score based on recorded votes where available; otherwise consistent party-line pattern for the chamber (noted).

Scorecards are not endorsements. Our Piedmont Education Foundation is a nonpartisan 501(c)(3) and does not endorse or oppose any candidate or political party.