Pricey Harrison Scorecard | Our Piedmont Education Foundation

← Back to all candidate scorecards

Mary “Pricey” Harrison

Democrat · North Carolina House · District 61

Guilford County (central Greensboro area)

Our Piedmont Score

–5 / 9

Cool side of the gauge

CoolHot

Responsiveness Score to Piedmont Concerns

Demographic & Background

Residence: Greensboro, Guilford County, NC

Occupation: Retired communications / civil litigation attorney

Prior Public Service:

North Carolina House of Representatives (2005–present; 11 terms; previously District 57, now 61)

Other: Duke University (BA) and UNC School of Law (JD); long-time environmental and public-education advocate; President of the Julian Price Family Foundation.

Voting Record on Key Issues (2025–2026 Session)

Affordability / housing / tax items (first three rows) are weighted double. See footnotes.

Bill / Issue	Vote	Weight	Notes
SB 889 – Property Tax Reappraisal Moratorium	Voted Against (No)	–2	Recorded No on the tax reappraisal moratorium
HB 162 – Parking Lot Reform / Stormwater Control Act	Voted For	+2	Near-unanimous bipartisan support
SB 445 – Regulatory Reform Act of 2026 (ADU + commercial redevelopment)	Opposed	–2	Opposed the regulatory-reform package (see footnote on status)
HB 87 – Educational Choice for Children Act	Voted Against	–1	Opposed school-choice tax-credit expansion (veto override)
SB 153 – North Carolina Border Protection Act (287(g))	Voted Against	–1	Opposed mandatory 287(g) and related measures (veto override)
DEI Prohibition bills (HB 171 / SB 227 / SB 558)	Voted Against	–1	Opposed bans on DEI promotion

Footnotes

1. Weighting: The three affordability / housing / tax items (SB 889, HB 162, SB 445) are weighted twice as heavily as the other issues to reflect the project’s priority on property-tax affordability and housing supply in the Piedmont.

2. SB 445 status: As of this writing (July 2026) SB 445 remains in conference committee after the House passed an amended version and the Senate declined to concur. Scoring reflects the legislator’s clear position relative to the regulatory-reform package that contained the ADU and commercial-redevelopment provisions.

3. Key absences: An excused absence or non-vote on a double-weighted (affordability) bill carries a light penalty of –1 instead of zero.

4. Party gravity: No votes by this legislator broke party gravity on the tracked bills. Positions followed typical Democratic caucus patterns; the parking-reform vote was bipartisan.

Sources: NC General Assembly roll-call records, bill trackers, official biography. Official photo: NC General Assembly.

Scorecards are not endorsements. Our Piedmont Education Foundation is a nonpartisan 501(c)(3) and does not endorse or oppose any candidate or political party.